Erebaur

Identification & instruments

The instruments gemologists use to identify a stone, from the 10× loupe and refractometer to laser spectroscopy and mass spectrometry, and how trace elements help laboratories suggest where a gem formed.

Entries
6
Figures
2
Words
1 406
Reading
6 min
Sources
26

Identification answers a sequence of questions: what the material is, whether it is natural or man-made, and whether it has been treated. For a small group of high-value stones a further question follows, which is where the gem formed. No single test settles all of them. A trained gemologist can name most gems with portable instruments that measure refractive index, optical character, specific gravity, light absorption and inclusions. Laboratory-grown diamonds, many treatments and geographic origin call for spectrometers and chemical analysis, and even then conclusions rest on comparison with reference collections of known stones. This chapter moves from the hand tools taught in gemology courses to the equipment of major laboratories, and ends with the geochemistry behind origin reports.

(12.01)Instruments

Loupe and microscope

Magnification is the first test and the one used most. The standard loupe is a 10× triplet: three cemented lenses that correct color fringing (chromatic aberration) and edge blur (spherical aberration). Ten power is the reference magnification for diamond clarity grading. The US Federal Trade Commission ties the word “flawless” to a stone that shows no blemishes when examined under a corrected magnifier at 10 power, with adequate illumination, by a person skilled in diamond grading. Stronger hand lenses have narrower fields of view and shallower focus, so they are harder to use.

The gemological microscope is a binocular stereo microscope with lighting designed for gems. In darkfield illumination a baffle blocks direct light so inclusions shine against a black background. Brightfield shows low-relief features and curved growth lines as dark shapes, and overhead or fiber-optic light reveals polish marks and pits. Immersing a stone in liquid cuts surface reflections and makes color zoning easier to see. GIA notes that what the microscope yields depends on the operator, who needs years of training.

Gemologists look for diagnostic features: curved striae and gas bubbles in flame-fusion synthetic corundum, flux fingerprints and platinum platelets in flux-grown stones, doubled facet junctions in synthetic moissanite, and flash effects along filled fractures in treated diamonds.

(12.02)Instruments

Refractometer, polariscope and dichroscope

The refractometer measures refractive index (RI) by critical angle. A flat facet rests on a dense glass hemicylinder, joined by a drop of contact liquid, and the boundary between light and dark on the internal scale marks the stone's RI, read under yellow light. A doubly refractive stone gives two readings as it is turned; their difference is the birefringence, and the way they move shows whether the stone is uniaxial or biaxial. Curved cabochons give a blurred spot reading instead. GIA's contact liquid has an RI of 1.81, and nothing above it can be read, so high zircon, cubic zirconia, diamond and garnet at the top of its range show no edge and are recorded as over the limit.

The polariscope places a gem between crossed polarizing filters. A singly refractive stone stays dark through a full turn; a doubly refractive one goes dark every 90°; a microcrystalline aggregate such as chalcedony stays light. Internal strain can make a singly refractive stone show anomalous double refraction, which turning the analyzer will separate from true double refraction. A conoscope adds interference figures that tell uniaxial stones from biaxial ones.

The dichroscope shows pleochroic colors side by side: two in a uniaxial stone, three in a biaxial one, none in a singly refractive one.

Fig. 12.1

Refractometer readings

Gem
  1. Opal
    1.370–1.470
  2. Moonstone (orthoclase)
    1.518–1.526
  3. Amber
    1.540
  4. Iolite
    1.542–1.551
  5. Quartz
    1.544–1.553
  6. Emerald, aquamarine (beryl)
    1.577–1.583
  7. Nephrite
    1.606–1.632
  8. Turquoise
    1.610–1.650
  9. Topaz
    1.619–1.627
  10. Tourmaline
    1.624–1.644
  11. Peridot
    1.650–1.690
  12. Kunzite (spodumene)
    1.660–1.676
  13. Jadeite
    1.666–1.680
  14. Tanzanite
    1.691–1.700
  15. Garnet group (top is OTL)
    1.714–1.888
  16. Spinel
    1.718
  17. Alexandrite (chrysoberyl)
    1.746–1.755
  18. Ruby, sapphire (corundum)
    1.762–1.770
  19. Zircon, highOTL
    1.925–1.984
  20. Cubic zirconiaOTL
    2.150–2.180
  21. DiamondOTL
    2.420

OTL = over the limit. Stones above the 1.81 contact liquid show no shadow edge on a standard refractometer and need other tests.

(12.03)Instruments

Spectroscope, Chelsea filter, UV lamps and SG balance

The hand spectroscope spreads light that has passed through a gem into a spectrum, where absorbed wavelengths appear as dark lines and bands. Prism models stretch the blue end; diffraction-grating models spread the visible range more evenly. Several patterns are diagnostic: chromium gives ruby a narrow line at 694 nm, iron in corundum produces features near 377, 388 and 450 nm once the iron content passes about 150 ppma, and zircon shows a series of lines gemologists call the organ-pipe spectrum. GIA calls the hand spectroscope one of the hardest portable instruments to master.

The Chelsea filter passes light in two narrow bands and is used to screen certain green, red and blue stones and to detect dyes in chalcedony. Filters of this kind assist identification but are not used for a final determination.

Ultraviolet lamps test fluorescence and phosphorescence, long-wave at 365 nm and short-wave at 254 nm. An inert response does not prove a stone untreated, and luminescence is only semiquantitative.

The hydrostatic balance measures specific gravity by Archimedes' principle: weight in air divided by loss of weight in water. A drop of detergent lowers surface tension. The method is slow and unreliable for very small or porous stones, but it separates look-alikes of different density.

(12.04)Instruments

Diamond testers

Diamond conducts heat better than any other gem material, and handheld thermal testers rely on that. A heated metal tip touches the stone and the instrument measures how quickly heat flows away. Cubic zirconia, glass, YAG, GGG, strontium titanate and colorless sapphire conduct heat poorly and fail; diamond passes.

Synthetic moissanite defeated the test when it reached jewelry in the late 1990s. GIA reported at the time that its thermal properties are so close to diamond's that thermal probes react to it as if it were diamond. Later multi-testers added electrical conductivity, since moissanite is a semiconductor. Boron-bearing type IIb diamond, natural or laboratory-grown, is electrically conductive as well. A loupe gives a quick cross-check: moissanite is doubly refractive, so its back facet junctions look doubled, and it is lighter than diamond, with a specific gravity of 3.22 against 3.52.

No thermal or electrical probe separates natural from laboratory-grown diamond, because both are the same carbon crystal. That needs spectroscopic screening, and GIA states that no rapid, low-cost screening tool identifies every laboratory-grown diamond. Devices such as GIA's iD100 test loose or mounted colorless to near-colorless stones of 0.9 mm and larger in under two seconds and return “pass” or “refer.” A referred stone goes to a laboratory.

(12.05)Instruments

Laboratory spectroscopy, chemistry and imaging

Major laboratories add instruments that probe structure and chemistry, most of them nondestructive.

FTIR (Fourier-transform infrared) spectroscopy records infrared absorption. It establishes diamond type by detecting nitrogen and boron, and reveals polymer impregnation in jade and evidence of some treatments in corundum. UV-Vis-NIR spectroscopy measures absorption from ultraviolet to near infrared to establish the cause of color; stones are cooled with liquid nitrogen to sharpen their spectra. Raman spectroscopy aims a laser at a spot and reads small energy shifts in the scattered light, a vibrational fingerprint that identifies a gem or an inclusion below the surface, and it works best on transparent to translucent material. Photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy, also laser-excited and usually run at liquid-nitrogen temperature, detects defects present in parts per billion and is central to separating natural, laboratory-grown and treated diamonds. The DiamondView images luminescence under ultraviolet light below 225 nm to show growth patterns.

For chemistry, EDXRF (energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence) reads the characteristic X-rays of each element but cannot detect anything lighter than sodium, so it misses beryllium in corundum. LA-ICP-MS (laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry) vaporizes a speck, leaving a crater about 50 µm across, usually on the girdle, and measures most trace elements below 1 ppm and heavy elements to parts per billion. For pearls, X-ray radiography and micro-CT image internal structure, though mounted pearls generally have to be removed first.

Fig. 12.2

Instruments and what they measure

Instruments and what they measure
10× loupeMagnified view of inclusions, surface features and cut at the reference power for diamond clarity gradingA first look at any stone; spotting doubling, bubbles, filled fractures and damage
Gemological microscopeInclusions, growth features and surface marks under darkfield, brightfield, fiber-optic light or immersionSeparating natural from synthetic and detecting treatments; what it yields depends on the operator's training
RefractometerRefractive index up to the 1.81 contact liquid limit, plus birefringence and optic characterIdentifying faceted and cabochon gems below the liquid limit; higher stones read as over the limit
Polariscope and conoscopeSingle against double refraction, aggregate structure, strain, and interference figuresA doubly refractive stone goes dark every 90°, an aggregate stays light, strain shows as anomalous double refraction
DichroscopePleochroic colors along different optical directions: two in uniaxial stones, three in biaxial onesSeparating ruby from red garnet or spinel; checking tanzanite, iolite and tourmaline
Hand spectroscopeVisible absorption lines and bands, spread by a prism or a diffraction gratingRecognizing chromium, iron and cobalt spectra; among the hardest portable instruments to master
Chelsea filterLight transmitted in two narrow bands of the visible spectrumScreening certain green, red and blue stones and dyed chalcedony; never a final determination
UV lamps (365 and 254 nm)Color and strength of fluorescence and phosphorescence under long-wave and short-wave ultravioletDescribing diamond fluorescence; an inert response does not prove a stone untreated
Hydrostatic balanceSpecific gravity from weight in air and loss of weight in waterSeparating look-alikes of different density; unreliable on very small or porous stones
Thermal and electrical diamond testerHeat conductivity and electrical conductivitySeparating diamond from simulants and moissanite; cannot detect laboratory-grown diamond
FTIR spectrometerInfrared absorption by nitrogen, boron, hydrogen, water and polymersDiamond typing; detecting polymer impregnation in jade; evidence of some treatments
UV-Vis-NIR spectrometerAbsorption from ultraviolet through visible to near infrared, often with liquid-nitrogen coolingEstablishing cause of color; screening metamorphic against basalt-related sapphire
Raman spectrometerVibrational spectrum from laser light scatteringIdentifying gems and inclusions without damage; works best on transparent to translucent material
Photoluminescence spectrometerLaser-excited emission from defects present at parts per billion, usually at liquid-nitrogen temperatureSeparating natural, laboratory-grown and treated diamonds
DiamondViewLuminescence images under ultraviolet light below 225 nmShowing the growth structures of CVD and HPHT laboratory-grown diamonds
EDXRFElement composition from sodium upward via characteristic X-rays; blind to lighter elementsScreening chemistry and pearl environment (Mn, Sr); cannot detect beryllium in corundum
LA-ICP-MSTrace elements below 1 ppm, and heavy elements to parts per billion, from a crater about 50 µm wideGeographic origin, beryllium diffusion detection and isotope work; leaves a small crater on the girdle
X-ray radiography and micro-CTTwo- and three-dimensional internal structure from X-ray absorptionSeparating natural from cultured pearls; mounted pearls generally have to be unmounted first
(12.06)Instruments

Trace-element geochemistry and origin

A gem's trace elements reflect the rocks and fluids it grew from, so laboratories compare a stone's chemistry, inclusions and spectra with reference samples of known origin. The approach expanded in the early 2000s, when laboratories adopted LA-ICP-MS to detect beryllium diffusion in corundum and found the same data useful for telling deposits apart.

For blue sapphire GIA uses magnesium, titanium, vanadium, iron and gallium. It screens first with the 880 nm absorption band, which separates metamorphic from basalt-related stones, then plots the unknown against reference stones of similar composition, and accepts an origin only when inclusions, chemistry and spectra all agree. Peucat and colleagues showed in 2007 that magmatic sapphires carry high gallium and low magnesium, giving a Ga/Mg ratio above 10, while metamorphic sapphires fall below it.

Inclusions add a time dimension. SSEF's GemTOF, a time-of-flight LA-ICP-MS installed in July 2016, records nearly the whole periodic table at once and can date zircon inclusions by uranium and lead. Raman spectra of those inclusions help as well: zircons in geologically young Kashmir sapphires give narrow peaks, while the older, more metamict zircons in Madagascar sapphires give broad bands.

The method has real limits. GIA reports that stones from different localities often overlap so far that origin cannot be determined, and issues an inconclusive result rather than guess.

(12.S)Sources26 references

Sources

  1. Ahline and Rizzo (2024). Analysis of Gemstones at GIA Laboratories. Gems & Gemology 60(4)gia.edu
  2. Sun, Jollands and Palke (2024). Chemical Analysis in the Gemological Laboratory: XRF and LA-ICP-MS. Gems & Gemology 60(4)gia.edu
  3. Boehm (2002). Portable Instruments and Tips on Practical Gemology in the Field. Gems & Gemology 37(4), 14-27gia.edu
  4. GIA Polariscope User Guidegia.edu
  5. Hughes (2014). Pleochroism in Faceted Gems: An Introduction. Gems & Gemology 50(3)gia.edu
  6. D'Haenens-Johansson et al. (2024). Glowing Gems: Fluorescence and Phosphorescence. Gems & Gemology 60(4)gia.edu
  7. Dubinsky, Stone-Sundberg and Emmett (2020). A Quantitative Description of the Causes of Color in Corundum. Gems & Gemology 56(1)gia.edu
  8. Breeding and Shigley (2009). The Type Classification System of Diamonds and Its Importance in Gemology. Gems & Gemology 45(2)gia.edu
  9. Nassau, McClure, Elen and Shigley (1997). Synthetic Moissanite: A New Diamond Substitute. Gems & Gemology 33(4)gia.edu
  10. Palke et al. (2019). Geographic Origin Determination of Blue Sapphire. Gems & Gemology 55(4)gia.edu
  11. Eaton-Magaña, Hardman and Odake (2024). Laboratory-Grown Diamonds: An Update on Identification. Gems & Gemology 60(2)gia.edu
  12. SSEF: GemTOF, laser ablation ICP time-of-flight mass spectrometry, installed July 2016ssef.ch
  13. SSEF: Zircon inclusion analysis for sapphire origin determinationssef.ch
  14. Peucat et al. (2007). Ga/Mg ratio as a new geochemical tool to differentiate magmatic from metamorphic blue sapphires. Lithos 98, 261-274sciencedirect.com
  15. eCFR: 16 CFR §23.13, misuse of the words flawless and perfectecfr.gov
  16. GIA Store: Refractive Index Liquid, refractive index 1.81store.gia.edu
  17. GIA Store: Chelsea Color Filterstore.gia.edu
  18. GIA Store: GIA iD100 specificationsstore.gia.edu
  19. Nassau (1981). Cubic Zirconia: An Update. Gems & Gemology 17(1), 9-19gia.edu
  20. GIA Gem Encyclopedia: index of gemological property tablesgia.edu
  21. GIA Gem Encyclopedia: Garnet, refractive index 1.714-1.888gia.edu
  22. GIA Gem Encyclopedia: Amber, refractive index 1.540gia.edu
  23. GIA Gem Encyclopedia: Jade, jadeite and nephrite refractive indexgia.edu
  24. GIA Gem Encyclopedia: Opal, refractive index 1.37-1.47gia.edu
  25. GIA Gem Encyclopedia: Zircon, high-type refractive index 1.925-1.984gia.edu
  26. GIA Gem Encyclopedia: Diamond, refractive index 2.42 and specific gravity 3.52gia.edu

Last reviewed September 2026. Figures in tables are drawn from these sources; prices and regulations change, so check dates before relying on them.